Breaking the mould: Redefining gender in medical education in India

Authors

  • Surbhi Shrivastava Department of Sociology, Emory University
  • Sangeeta Rege Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes (CEHAT)

Keywords:

Gender, India, Medical education, Sex, Social determinants of health, Transgender

Abstract

The role of gender as a social determinant of health is widely studied and accepted in global and national contexts alike. A key area of concern has been the inadequate and inaccurate representation of gender in contemporary medicine. Collective reviews of popular undergraduate medical textbooks in India have deemed the content as, at best, gender-blind and, at worst, gender-biased. Yet, large-scale change towards engendering medical education is still awaited. This article attempts to rationalize the need for gender-sensitivity in medical education, particularly highlighting the bane of an improper understanding of gender. It elaborates the merits of integrating gender in medical education, as seen through an initiative in medical colleges of Maharashtra. Finally, the article submits that gender-integration is an important first step among many which can guide an intersectional approach to practising medicine in India, and encourage ground-level change, as the country strives to achieve universal health coverage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agnes F. To whom do experts testify? Ideological challenges of feminist jurisprudence. Econ Polit Wkly. 2005;40(18):1859–66.

Tucker R, Collins M. The science of sex verification and athletic performance. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010;5(2):127–39.

Moaddab A, McCullough LB, Chervenak FA, Dildy GA, Shamshirsaz AA. Virginity testing in professional obstetric and gynaecological ethics. Lancet. 2015;388(10039):98–100. Available from https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01275-1

Olson RM, García-Moreno C. Virginity testing: a systematic review. Reprod Health. 2017;14(61):1–10.

Gaitonde R. Community Medicine: Incorporating gender sensitivity. Econ Polit Wkly. 2005;40(18):1887–92.

Iyengar K. How gender-sensitive are Obstetrics and Gynaecology textbooks? Econ Polit Wkly. 2005;40(18):1839–46.

Patel V. Gender and mental health: A review of two textbooks of psychiatry. Econ Polit Wkly. 2005;40(18):1850–8.

Indyk JA. Disorders/differences of sex development (DSDs) for primary care: the approach to the infant with ambiguous genitalia. Transl Pediatr. 2017;6(4):323–34.

National Center for Transgender Equality. Frequently Asked Questions about Transgender People. 2016 Jul 09 {cited 2021 Mar 09]. Available from https://transequality.org/issues/resources/frequently-asked-questions-about-transgender-people

Akinkuolie AO, Mora S. Are there sex differences in acute coronary syndrome presentation? A guide through the maze. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(20):1–3.

Jewkes R, Morrell R, Hearn J, Lundqvist E, Blackbeard D, Lindegger G, Quayle M, Sikweyiya Y, Gottzén L. Hegemonic masculinity: combining theory and practice in gender interventions. Cult Heal Sex. 2015 Oct 16 [cited 2021 Mar 9];17(sup2):96–111. Available from https://www.doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2015.1085094

Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes. Integrating Gender in Medical Education: Assessing Impact. Mumbai: CEHAT; 2016. Available from http://www.cehat.org/uploads/files/GME Report%281%29.pdf

Govind N, Chowkhani K. Integrating concerns of gender, sexuality and marital status in the medical curriculum. Indian J Med Ethics. 2020;5(2):92–4.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-10

How to Cite

Shrivastava, S., & Rege, S. (2021). Breaking the mould: Redefining gender in medical education in India. Research and Humanities in Medical Education, 8, 25–28. Retrieved from https://rhime.in/ojs/index.php/rhime/article/view/433

Issue

Section

Perspective